Mizan Lens · Culture · You
The culture survey
A 42-item read of your part of the organisation, in both directions — where a value is withheld and where it is overextended. Each item asks how often something has happened, not whether it was good or bad, and not what you believe about the place. Forty-two items, plus two optional questions at the end. Anonymous; nothing identifies you; your answers are deleted within 24 hours, and the scores they produce are kept — unlinked to you or to your report — so the instrument can be calibrated.
The analysis did not run.
Nothing was produced. We do not show an estimated or partly-guessed reading in place of one we could not take — a report you cannot trust is worse than no report. Our team has been notified automatically.
Anonymous by design: one row with your ratings and no identity, purged within 24 hours. What outlives it is the numbers above — the two scores for each of the seven domains, your values match and your three engagement answers — with no name, no email, no link to this report, nothing you typed, and a date rather than a time. They are the only way to set the balance threshold from real answers instead of picking one, which is why the read above still says it is pending. What is kept, in full.
What this instrument is and is not
This is a structured diagnostic aid, not a psychometrically validated assessment. It has not been through formal reliability or validity testing, and there is no norm group behind the numbers. It reads perception and self-report: the result is a prompt for a conversation, not a measurement of a person or an organisation.
It must not be used to make or justify an employment decision about any individual — hiring, selection, promotion, pay, performance rating, discipline or termination — and it must not be offered as evidence in one. Nothing here is legal, medical or regulatory advice.
How your data is handled is set out in the privacy policy.